PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 31, 2025
This joint resolution prohibits a proposed foreign military sale of certain defense articles and services to Israel.
People & committees
Rep. Jayapal, Pramila [D-WA-7] · D–WA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jul 1, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.J.Res.83 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.J.Res.83 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.J.Res.83 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.J.Res.83 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
PlainBill explanation
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-03-31 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
This joint resolution would prohibit a specific proposed military sale to Israel involving bomb bodies and penetrator warheads. The prohibition concerns the identified sale, rather than military sales to Israel generally.
That the following proposed foreign military sale to Israel is prohibited:
thirty-five thousand five hundred twenty-nine (35,529) MK 84 or BLU–117 General Purpose (GP) bomb bodies, or a combination of both; and four thousand (4,000) I–2000 Penetrator warheads.
The proposed prohibition covers the sale identified in Transmittal No. 25–34, a sale notification submitted to Congress under the Arms Export Control Act and published in the Congressional Record on March 3, 2025. It specifies 35,529 bomb bodies, consisting of MK 84 models, BLU–117 models, or a combination, plus 4,000 I–2000 penetrator warheads.
The sale of the following defense articles and services, described in Transmittal No. 25–34, submitted to Congress pursuant to section 36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2776(b)(1)), and published in the Congressional Record on March 3, 2025: thirty-five thousand five hundred twenty-nine (35,529) MK 84 or BLU–117 General Purpose (GP) bomb bodies, or a combination of both; and four thousand (4,000) I–2000 Penetrator warheads.
The supplied July 1, 2025 source snapshot records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on March 31, 2025.
Source snapshot updated 2025-07-01T14:14:31Z. 2025-03-31: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. 2025-03-31: Introduced in House
A closer look
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-03-31. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish the content of other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; accompanying earmark disclosures and committee materials were not supplied.
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No narrow benefit, preferential exemption, or special carve-out was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Jul 1, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI