PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 108-107.
Congressional Research Service
Version 49 · Public Law · Nov 7, 2003
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Extends until November 21, 2003: (1) the law making continuing appropriations for FY 2004; and (2) the waiver of certain conditions under the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2003 on the planning, design, or construction of a chemical weapons destruction facility in Russia.
People & committees
Rep. Young, C. W. Bill [R-FL-10] · R–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 108-107.
Became Public Law No: 108-107.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S14228; text as passed Senate: CR S14228)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S14228; text as passed Senate: CR S14228)
Received in the Senate, read twice.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 418 - 5 (Roll no. 605). (text: CR H10393)
House roll call 605 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 418 - 5 (Roll no. 605).(text: CR H10393)
House roll call 605 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H10424-10425)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate, the Speaker put the question on passage of the joint resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Obey demanded the yeas and nays and pursuant to clause VIII of rule XX, the Speaker postponed further proceedings on passage of the joint resolution until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 76.
Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 76 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 430. (consideration: CR H10393-10396)
Rule H. Res. 430 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 430 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 76 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.J.Res.76 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.J.Res.76 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.J.Res.76 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.J.Res.76 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.