PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 108-104.
Congressional Research Service
Version 49 · Public Law · Oct 31, 2003
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced in the House. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Amends the law making continuing appropriations for FY 2004 to: (1) extend such law through November 7, 2003; (2) make available to the Secretary of Transportation out of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund such amounts as may be necessary for administrative expenses of the Grants-in-aid Airports program at the current rate of operations; and (3) repeal the continuing availability of funding for administrative expenses of the Federal Highway Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Federal Transit Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
Amends the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2003 to extend through November 7, 2003, the waiver of certain conditions on the planning, design, or construction of a chemical weapons destruction facility in Russia.
People & committees
Rep. Young, C. W. Bill [R-FL-10] · R–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 108-104.
Became Public Law No: 108-104.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S13696)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Received in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S13696)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 406 - 13 (Roll no. 583). (text: CR H10158)
House roll call 583 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 406 - 13 (Roll no. 583).(text: CR H10158)
House roll call 583 · Individual votesThe previous question was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 75.
Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 75 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 417. (consideration: CR H10157-10163)
Rule H. Res. 417 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 417 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 75 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions.
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.J.Res.75 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.J.Res.75 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.J.Res.75 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.J.Res.75 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.