PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.On passage Failed by recorded vote: 85 - 324, 1 Present (Roll no. 548). (consideration: CR H9309)
Congressional Research Service
Version 79 · Reported to House without amendment · Sep 29, 2005
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Disapproves the recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission as submitted by the President on September 15, 2005.
People & committees
Rep. LaHood, Ray [R-IL-18] · R–IL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
On passage Failed by recorded vote: 85 - 324, 1 Present (Roll no. 548). (consideration: CR H9309)
House roll call 548 · Individual votesMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: On passage Failed by recorded vote: 85 - 324, 1 Present (Roll no. 548).(consideration: CR H9309)
House roll call 548 · Individual votesThe House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.J. Res. 65.
The Committee of the Whole resumed its sitting and continued with general debate on H.J. Res. 65.
The Committee of the Whole rose informally.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with two hours of general debate on H.J. Res. 65.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Phil Gingrey to act as Chairman of the Committee.
On motion to resolve into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union Agreed to by voice vote.
Mr. Hunter moved to resolve into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H9289-9293, H9293-9309; text of measure as reported in House: CR H9308)
Referred to the Subcommittee on Readiness.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 132.
Reported adversely by the Committee on Armed Services. H. Rept. 109-243.
Reported adversely by the Committee on Armed Services. H. Rept. 109-243.
Ordered to be Reported Adversely by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 14.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Dec 5, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.J.Res.65 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.J.Res.65 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.J.Res.65 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.J.Res.65 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.