PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.J.Res.58 / 119th Congress

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to "Medicare Program; Calendar Year (CY) 2025 Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) Rate Update; HH Quality Reporting Program Requirements; HH Value-Based Purchasing Expanded Model Requirements; Home Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIG) Items and Services Rate Update; and Other Medicare Policies".

Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 12, 2025

This joint resolution nullifies the rule titled Medicare Program; Calendar Year (CY) 2025 Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) Rate Update; HH Quality Reporting Program Requirements; HH Value-Based Purchasing Expanded Model Requirements; Home Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIG) Items and Services Rate Update; and Other Medicare Policies, which was issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on November 7, 2024.

The rule sets Medicare payment rates for 2025 for home health services, disposable negative pressure wound therapy (dNPWT) devices, and intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) items and services. It also specifies changes to reporting and participation requirements for providers of home health services and long-term care facilities under Medicare, including a requirement that long-term care facilities report additional data regarding acute respiratory illnesses.

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Clyde, Andrew S. [R-GA-9] · R–GA

Committees

  • Energy and Commerce Committee
  • Ways and Means Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    2. Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

    3. Introduced in House

    4. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jun 13, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.J.Res.58 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.J.Res.58 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.J.Res.58 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.J.Res.58 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources

    Read the proposal in plain language

    AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 20, 2026

    Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-02-12 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

    What it would do

    This resolution proposes to cancel a federal Medicare rule addressing 2025 payments for home health care, reporting on care quality, and other Medicare policies. The rule also covers payment rates for immune-globulin treatment delivered into a vein at home. The proposal would remove the named rule’s legal effect; it does not specify replacement policies.

    Check the source
    That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to Medicare Program; Calendar Year (CY) 2025 Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) Rate Update; HH Quality Reporting Program Requirements; HH Value-Based Purchasing Expanded Model Requirements; Home Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIG) Items and Services Rate Update; and Other Medicare Policies (89 Fed. Reg. 88354 (November 7, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-12

    How it would work

    If enacted, the resolution would disapprove the entire named Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services rule, published on November 7, 2024, at page 88354 of volume 89 of the Federal Register, the federal government's publication for rules and notices. Its instruction that the rule have no legal effect contains no exceptions, separate implementation date, or expiration date.

    Check the source
    That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services relating to Medicare Program; Calendar Year (CY) 2025 Home Health Prospective Payment System (HH PPS) Rate Update; HH Quality Reporting Program Requirements; HH Value-Based Purchasing Expanded Model Requirements; Home Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIG) Items and Services Rate Update; and Other Medicare Policies (89 Fed. Reg. 88354 (November 7, 2024)), and such rule shall have no force or effect.
    Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2025-02-12

    What the record shows

    The supplied action snapshot, updated June 13, 2025, records introduction in the House on February 12, 2025, and referral that day to the Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce committees for consideration within their respective jurisdictions. This snapshot does not establish subsequent passage or enactment.

    Check the sources
    Source snapshot updated 2025-06-13T20:35:59Z.
    Official legislative record · 2025-06-13T20:35:59Z
    2025-02-12: Introduced in House
    Official legislative record · 2025-06-13T20:35:59Z
    2025-02-12: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
    Official legislative record · 2025-06-13T20:35:59Z

    Riders & Targeted Benefits

    Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-02-12. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

    This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

    Riders

    Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    Earmarks

    Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    Other targeted benefits

    Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

    None identified in the reviewed text

    No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

    What this analysis cannot establish

    • The underlying Medicare rule and surrounding statutory framework are not supplied. The evidence therefore does not establish which payment rates or requirements would apply after disapproval, or how providers, patients, spending, or access to care would be affected.
    • The analysis concerns the supplied introduced text. The June 13, 2025 action snapshot does not establish the resolution's later status; missing later actions do not prove that it never advanced or became law.
    • No member requests, earmark disclosures, committee reports, or conference materials are supplied, limiting assessment of formal earmark status and legislative attachment history.

    Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Jun 13, 2025. How PlainBill uses AI