Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.
By Senator Hatch from Committee on Judiciary filed written report. Report No. 105-298. Minority views filed.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 13, 1997
Constitutional Amendment - Declares that the Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the U.S. flag.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 163 and the preceding unanimous consent agreement, the House proceeded with two hours and twenty minutes of general debate.
Mr. Canady asked unanimous consent that the time for general debate be extended for an additional 20 minutes, to be allocated to Mr. Lipinski and Mr. Gilchrest. Agreed to without objection.
Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 54 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The motion to recommit may include instructions only if offered by the Minority Leader or his designee. If including instructions, the motion to recommit shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 163. (consideration: CR H3730-3756)
Rule H. Res. 163 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 163 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 54 with 2 hours of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. The motion to recommit may include instructions only if offered by the Minority Leader or his designee. If including instructions, the motion to recommit shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 44.
Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 105-121.
Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 105-121.
Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 9.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Subcommittee Hearings Held.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E801-802)
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E290-291)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.J.Res.54 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.J.Res.54 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.J.Res.54 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.J.Res.54 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.