PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.J.Res.28 / 116th Congress

Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019

Became Public Law No: 116-5.

Official summary

Version 49 · Public Law · Jan 25, 2019

Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019

(Sec. 101) This joint resolution provides continuing FY2019 appropriations to several federal agencies through the earlier of February 15, 2019, or the enactment of the applicable appropriations legislation.

It is known as a continuing resolution (CR) and ends the partial government shutdown that began after the existing CR expired on December 21, 2018, because seven of the remaining FY2019 appropriations bills have not been enacted.

Showing the opening paragraphs of the official summary.

Read full official summaryShow less

(Five of the FY2019 appropriations bills were enacted last year, including

the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2019;

the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2019;

the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2019;

the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2019; and

the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2019.)

The CR also

makes appropriations available, pursuant to a requirement under current law, to compensate employees furloughed as a result of any lapse in appropriations that began on or about December 22, 2018;

ratifies and approves certain obligations incurred in anticipation of the appropriations made and the authority granted by this joint resolution;

reimburses or compensates certain states, federal grantees, and furloughed state employees for the lapse in appropriations; and

delays the release of required sequestration reports and orders by the Congressional Budget Office and the Office of Management and Budget.

Additionally, the CR extends through February 15, 2019, several programs and authorities, including

the authority for the Department of Health and Human Services Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority to withhold from public disclosure certain technical data or scientific information that reveals vulnerabilities of existing medical or public health defenses against biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological threats;

an exemption from antitrust laws for meetings and consultations to discuss the development of certain vaccines and drugs related to public health threats such as bioterrorism, pandemics, or epidemics;

the Violence Against Women Act;

the authority for the Environmental Protection Agency to collect and spend certain fees related to pesticides; and

several authorities related to immigration.

(Sec. 102) This section specifies that the time period covered by the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2019 includes the lapse in appropriations that began on or about December 22, 2018.

(Sec. 103) This section specifies that the requirement under current law to compensate employees furloughed as a result of a lapse in appropriations is subject to the enactment of appropriations legislation ending the lapse.

(Sec. 104) This section requires any debits on the scorecard maintained under the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO Act) for 2019 to be transferred to the 2020 scorecard.

(The PAYGO Act prohibits direct spending and revenue legislation from increasing the budget deficit. PAYGO scorecards are used to enforce the requirements and determine whether a sequestration order implementing spending cuts is necessary.)

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Lowey, Nita M. [D-NY-17] · D–NY

Committees

  • Appropriations Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Became Public Law No: 116-5.

    2. Became Public Law No: 116-5.

    3. Signed by President.

    4. Signed by President.

    5. Presented to President.

    6. Presented to President.

    7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    8. On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H1215-1216)

    9. Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(text: CR H1215-1216)

    10. Mrs. Lowey asked unanimous consent to take from the Speaker's table, with the Senate amendment thereto, and agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H1215-1216)

    11. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

    12. Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

    13. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote.

    14. Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S683-684)

    15. The joint resolution was considered read the second time.

    16. Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

    17. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    18. On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 184 (Roll no. 46).

      House roll call 46 · Individual votes
    19. Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 184 (Roll no. 46).

      House roll call 46 · Individual votes
    20. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1022-1023)

    21. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to the order of the House of January 17, 2019, the Chair put the question on passage of H.J.Res. 28 and by voice vote announced that the ayes prevailed. Mr. Scalise demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of passage through the legislative day of January 23, 2019.

    22. VITIATION OF EARLIER PROCEEDINGS - Mr. Hoyer asked unanimous consent to vacate proceedings by which House Joint Resolution 28 was passed, and the motion to reconsider laid upon the table, to the end that the Chair put the question on passage of House Joint Resolution 28 de novo, and further that if a recorded vote or the yeas and nays are ordered on the question of passage of House Joint Resolution 28, further proceedings may be postponed through the legislative day of January 23, 2019, as though under clause 8 of rule 20. Agreed to without objection.

    23. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    24. On passage Passed by voice vote. (text: CR H689)

    25. On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 195 - 222 (Roll no. 43).

      House roll call 43 · Individual votes
    26. Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H698-699)

    27. POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Granger motion to recommit with instructions, the Chair put the question on the motion to recommit and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Granger demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until later in the legislative day.

    28. The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.

    29. DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Granger motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment striking the date February 28, 2019 and inserting January 15, 2019.

    30. Ms. Granger moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on Appropriations. (text: CR H692)

    31. The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

    32. DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 28.

    33. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule with one motion to recommit. Also, the resolution provides that it shall be in order at any time through the legislative day of January 25, 2019, for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules.

    34. Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 52. (consideration: CR H689-692)

    35. Rule H. Res. 52 passed House.

    36. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 52 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 28. The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule with one motion to recommit. Also, the resolution provides that it shall be in order at any time through the legislative day of January 25, 2019, for the Speaker to entertain motions to suspend the rules.

    37. Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.

    38. Introduced in House

    39. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    Source last updated: Dec 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.J.Res.28 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.J.Res.28 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.J.Res.28 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.J.Res.28 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources