PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.J.Res.198 / 119th Congress

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the seventeenth article of amendment.

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Official summary

No official summary is available in the imported record yet.

Who introduced it

Rep. Self, Keith [R-TX-3] · R–TX

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
9 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Jul 9, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.J.Res.198 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.J.Res.198 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.J.Res.198 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.J.Res.198 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 19, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2026-06-25 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

This resolution proposes a constitutional amendment to repeal the Seventeenth Amendment. It would preserve the election and term of any Senator chosen before the new amendment becomes valid. The proposal would become part of the Constitution only if conventions in three-fourths of the states ratify it within ten years after submission for ratification. The supplied text does not reproduce the amendment being repealed.

Check the sources
That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by conventions in three-fourths of the several States within ten years after the date of its submission for ratification:
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-06-25
1. The seventeenth article of amendment to the Constitution is hereby repealed. 2. This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-06-25

How it would work

Ratification—formal approval—would have to come from conventions in three-fourths of the states within ten years after submission for ratification. That deadline runs from submission, not from the resolution's introduction.

Check the source
when ratified by conventions in three-fourths of the several States within ten years after the date of its submission for ratification
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-06-25

The proposed amendment could not be interpreted to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.

Check the source
2. This amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-06-25

What the record shows

The supplied action snapshot, updated July 9, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on the Judiciary on June 25, 2026.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-07-09T20:40:22Z. 2026-06-25: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. 2026-06-25: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-07-09T20:40:22Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2026-06-25. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion applies only to that version, not to other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow preferential benefit was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. The general transition protection does not warrant a targeted-benefit finding. This conclusion is limited to the supplied version.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The source bundle does not reproduce the Seventeenth Amendment or other relevant constitutional provisions. It therefore does not establish the current rules for choosing Senators or how those rules would operate after repeal.
  • The supplied history is limited to the July 9, 2026 snapshot. It does not establish subsequent congressional action, submission for ratification, or ratification; missing later history does not prove that these events never occurred.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Jul 9, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI