PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.J.Res.147 / 119th Congress

Terminating the national emergency declared to impose duties on articles imported from Brazil.

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Feb 2, 2026

This joint resolution terminates the national emergency that was declared by President Donald J. Trump in an executive order on July 30, 2025, that also imposed an additional 40% tariff on certain imports from Brazil based on the emergency declaration. (The executive order exempted certain products, such as civil aircraft and parts, wood pulp, precious metals, energy and energy products, and fertilizers, from this additional tariff.)

Read the summary on Congress.gov

Who introduced it

Rep. Meeks, Gregory W. [D-NY-5] · D–NY

Committees

  • Foreign Affairs Committee
6 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Apr 28, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.J.Res.147 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.J.Res.147 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.J.Res.147 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.J.Res.147 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Read the proposal in plain language

AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 19, 2026

Based on the full Introduced in House · 2026-02-02 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.

What it would do

This resolution proposes ending the national emergency that the President declared on July 30, 2025, in Executive Order 14323.

Check the source
the national emergency declared on July 30, 2025, by the President in Executive Order 14323 (90 Fed. Reg. 37739) is terminated.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-02-02

How it would work

The proposed termination invokes section 202 of the National Emergencies Act as its legal authority.

Check the source
That, pursuant to section 202 of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622), the national emergency declared on July 30, 2025, by the President in Executive Order 14323 (90 Fed. Reg. 37739) is terminated.
Official bill text · Introduced in House · 2026-02-02

What the record shows

The supplied action snapshot, updated April 28, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on February 2, 2026.

Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-04-28T13:17:20Z. 2026-02-02: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. 2026-02-02: Introduced in House
Official legislative record · 2026-04-28T13:17:20Z

Riders & Targeted Benefits

Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2026-02-02. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.

This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.

Riders

Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.

None identified in the reviewed text

No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version, not other versions or accompanying materials.

Earmarks

Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.

None identified in the reviewed text

No congressionally directed spending was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish the contents of other versions or accompanying disclosure materials.

Other targeted benefits

Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.

None identified in the reviewed text

No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version; the missing executive order limits assessment of who would be affected.

What this analysis cannot establish

  • The bundle does not reproduce Executive Order 14323 or section 202 of the National Emergencies Act. It therefore does not establish the emergency's subject, which people or activities would be affected, or the practical consequences of termination.
  • The supplied resolution sets no separate implementation date or detailed termination procedures.
  • The action snapshot does not establish passage or enactment. Its lack of later actions does not prove that the resolution never advanced or became law.

Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Apr 28, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI