PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 107-244.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 15, 2002
Amends Public Law 107-229 to extend until November 22, 2002, specified continuing appropriations for FY 2003.
People & committees
Rep. Young, C. W. Bill [R-FL-10] · R–FL
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 107-244.
Became Public Law No: 107-244.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Received in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S10557-10559, S10593; text: CR S10557)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Received in the Senate, read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S10557-10559, S10593; text: CR S10557)
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 228 - 172 (Roll no. 470). (text: CR H7960)
House roll call 470 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 228 - 172 (Roll no. 470).(text: CR H7960)
House roll call 470 · Individual votesOn motion to recommit with instructions Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 194 - 210 (Roll no. 469).
House roll call 469 · Individual votesThe previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
Floor summary: DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the motion to recommit with instructions.
Mr. Obey moved to recommit with instructions to Appropriations.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 123.
Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 123 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments. H. Res. 550, H. Res. 551, and H. Res. 577 are laid on the table.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 585. (consideration: CR H7960-7963)
Rule H. Res. 585 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 585 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 123 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments. H. Res. 550, H. Res. 551, and H. Res. 577 are laid on the table.
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.J.Res.123 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.J.Res.123 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.J.Res.123 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.J.Res.123 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.