No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Oct 2, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.J.Res.113 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.J.Res.113 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.J.Res.113 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.J.Res.113 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
View full prompt & sources
PlainBill explanation
Read the proposal in plain language
AI-generated · Source-checked by AI · Oct 19, 2026
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2025-08-15 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
What it would do
This proposed resolution would designate an annual Slavery Remembrance Day, condemn slavery and its harmful legacies, and encourage public remembrance. Its preamble identifies August 20 as the remembrance date, although the operative provision does not repeat that date. It would also authorize and request the President to call on people in the United States to observe the day with ceremonies and activities.
Check the sources
2. Slavery Remembrance Day That the House of Representatives and the Senate— (1) designate a Slavery Remembrance Day annually to serve as a reminder of the evils of slavery; (2) condemn slavery and its evil progenies; (3) encourage all to acknowledge the importance of slavery remembrance; and (4) authorizes and requests the President to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such days with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
Whereas the House of Representatives and the Senate recognize August 20th, as Slavery Remembrance Day and commemorate the lives of all enslaved people while also condemning the act and perpetuation of slavery in the United States of America and across the world;
Section 2 would designate a remembrance day every year to remind people of slavery's evils. The August 20 date appears in the preamble, the introductory statements explaining the proposal.
Check the sources
(1) designate a Slavery Remembrance Day annually to serve as a reminder of the evils of slavery;
The resolution would express Congress's condemnation of slavery and its harmful legacies and encourage everyone to acknowledge the importance of remembering slavery.
Check the source
(2) condemn slavery and its evil progenies; (3) encourage all to acknowledge the importance of slavery remembrance;
The President would be authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling for public ceremonies and activities. This language calls on people to participate; it does not require their participation.
Check the source
(4) authorizes and requests the President to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such days with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
The preamble would honor deceased members of Congress who served during and after Reconstruction by naming them honorary cosponsors.
Check the source
Whereas we posthumously recognize the following Members of Congress, who served during and after the Reconstruction Era, as honorary cosponsors of this resolution:
The preamble presents the suffering of enslaved people and their resistance as reasons for remembrance. It describes inhumane living and working conditions, the threat of family separation through sale, and enslaved people's contributions as leaders and revolutionaries.
Check the sources
Whereas enslaved people suffered a variety of miserable and often fatal maladies due to the Atlantic slave trade, and to inhumane living and working conditions;
Whereas, despite the horrors of slavery and against all odds, enslaved people became thought leaders and revolutionaries and changed the course of American history: Now, therefore, be it
The preamble asserts that descendants of enslaved people continue to experience slavery's legacies, including segregation, police brutality, mass incarceration, and institutionalized racism. This is the proposal's stated rationale.
Check the source
Whereas, while slavery was abolished, descendants of the enslaved continue to live with the effects of the progeny of slavery: Jim Crow, mass lynching, segregation, police brutality, mass incarceration, and institutionalized racism; and
The supplied actions snapshot, updated October 2, 2026, records introduction in the House and referral to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on August 15, 2025.
Check the source
Source snapshot updated 2026-10-02T08:05:52Z.
2025-08-15: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
2025-08-15: Introduced in House
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2025-08-15. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision or policy change attached to appropriations was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials. Member requests, earmark disclosures, and committee or conference materials were not supplied.
Other targeted benefits
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow carve-out, special exemption, or preferential treatment was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion is limited to that version and does not establish absence in other versions or accompanying materials.
What this analysis cannot establish
The bundle supplies the introduced text and a dated actions snapshot. It does not establish subsequent passage, amendment, or enactment; the absence of later actions does not prove that none occurred.
August 20 appears in the preamble but is not repeated in the operative designation. The text specifies annual observance without a first observance year, implementation deadline, or termination date.
The supplied text specifies no funding, enforcement mechanism, or administrative program for observances.
Historical accounts and statements about continuing harms are presented as the resolution's introductory assertions. The bundle supplies no independent evidence verifying them.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Oct 2, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI