PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 18, 1995
Disapproves the recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission as submitted by the President on July 13, 1995.
People & committees
Rep. Tejeda, Frank [D-TX-28] · D–TX
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 75 - 343 (Roll no. 647).
House roll call 647 · Individual votesFailed of passage/not agreed to in House: On passage Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 75 - 343 (Roll no. 647).
House roll call 647 · Individual votesDEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of Public Law 101-510, the House proceeded with two hours of debate.
Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR H8685-8704)
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 116.
Reported adversely by the Committee on National Security. H. Rept. 104-220.
Reported adversely by the Committee on National Security. H. Rept. 104-220.
Ordered to be Reported Adversely.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on National Security.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jun 6, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.J.Res.102 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.J.Res.102 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.J.Res.102 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.J.Res.102 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.