PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 111-290.
Congressional Research Service
Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 4, 2010
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Amends the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (P.L. 111-242) to extend through December 18, 2010, specified continuing appropriations for FY2011.
People & committees
Rep. Obey, David R. [D-WI-7] · D–WI
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 111-290.
Became Public Law No: 111-290.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Cleared for White House.
Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8391)
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S8391)
Received in the Senate, read twice.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 239 - 178 (Roll no. 593). (text: CR H7777)
House roll call 593 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 239 - 178 (Roll no. 593).(text: CR H7777)
House roll call 593 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H7813-7814)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 101, the Chair put the question on adoption of the resolution and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Lewis (CA) demanded the yeas and nays, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the resolution until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H7778)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 101.
Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 101 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments. All points of order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. All points of order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1741. (consideration: CR H7777-7778)
Rule H. Res. 1741 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1741 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 101 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be considered read. Bill is closed to amendments. All points of order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. All points of order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived.
Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.J.Res.101 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.J.Res.101 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.J.Res.101 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.J.Res.101 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.