PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 25, 2002
Disapproves the extension with respect to Vietnam of the President's authority under the Trade Act of 1974 to waive freedom of emigration requirements to make a nonmarket economy country eligible for normal trade relations, programs of credits, credit guarantees, or investment guarantees, and commercial agreements.
People & committees
Rep. Rohrabacher, Dana [R-CA-45] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 91 - 338 (Roll no. 329). (text: CR H5098)
House roll call 329 · Individual votesFailed of passage/not agreed to in House: On passage Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 91 - 338 (Roll no. 329).(text: CR H5098)
House roll call 329 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5289-5290)
POSTPONED ROLL CALL VOTE - At the conclusion of debate on the joint resolution, the Chair put the question on passage and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. The Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered and the Chair postponed the roll call until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 101.
That it may be in order on July 23, 2002, or any day thereafter, to consider in the House H.J. Res. 101; that the joint resolution be considered as read; that all points of order against the joint resolution be waived; that the joint resolution be debatable for one hour, equally divided and controlled; and that the previous question be considered as ordered to final passage without intervening motion.
Considered pursuant to the order of 07/22/2002: (consideration: CR H5098-5107)
Consideration initiated pursuant to the order of 07/22/2002.
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 364.
Reported adversely by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 107-602.
Reported adversely by the Committee on Ways and Means. H. Rept. 107-602.
Ordered to be Reported Adversely.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.J.Res.101 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.J.Res.101 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.J.Res.101 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.J.Res.101 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.