PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Became Public Law No: 117-216.
Congressional Research Service
Version 49 · Public Law · Dec 2, 2022
This joint resolution requires the parties to the disputes between certain railroads and labor organizations to accept the most recent tentative agreements, side letters, and local carrier agreements entered into by the parties that have not been ratified before the date of enactment of this joint resolution.
People & committees
Rep. Payne, Donald M., Jr. [D-NJ-10] · D–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Became Public Law No: 117-216.
Became Public Law No: 117-216.
Signed by President.
Signed by President.
Presented to President.
Presented to President.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Passed Senate, under the order of 12/1/22, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 80 - 15. Record Vote Number: 372.
Senate roll call 372 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate, under the order of 12/1/22, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 80 - 15. Record Vote Number: 372.
Senate roll call 372 · Individual votesMeasure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S6929-6932)
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 570.
Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time. (Legislative Day Nov. 29, 2022).
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 290 - 137 (Roll no. 490). (text: CR H8661)
House roll call 490 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 290 - 137 (Roll no. 490).
House roll call 490 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H8669-8670)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.J. Res. 100, the Chair put the question on passage and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Graves (MO) demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on passage of H.J. Res. 100 until a time to be announced.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.J. Res. 100.
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3372, H.R. 6878, H.R. 8876 and H.J. Res. 100. The resolution provides for adoption of H. Res. 1495 and H. Con. Res. 118.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1499. (consideration: CR H8661-8667)
Rule H. Res. 1499 passed House.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1499 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3372, H.R. 6878, H.R. 8876 and H.J. Res. 100. The resolution provides for adoption of H. Res. 1495 and H. Con. Res. 118.
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.J.Res.100 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.J.Res.100 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.J.Res.100 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.J.Res.100 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.