Proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 64-35. Record Vote No: 158.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jan 4, 1995
Constitutional Amendment - Requires the Congress, prior to each fiscal year, to adopt a statement in which total Federal outlays do not exceed total receipts, unless a three-fifths vote of both Houses authorizes a specific excess. Prohibits a bill to increase receipts from becoming law unless approved by a three-fifths majority in each House. Directs the President to submit a balanced budget. Sets a permanent limit on the amount of Federal public debt, prohibiting any increase unless legislation enacted by a three-fifths majority of both Houses become law. Requires roll call votes in the House and Senate under this amendment.
Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S3311-3314)
Dole motions to refer and recommit withdrawn by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3278)
Motion to commit to Senate Committee on Budget with instructions tabled in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 63-37. Record Vote No: 97. (consideration: CR S3278)
Motion to commit to Senate Committee on Budget with instructions tabled in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 63-37. Record Vote No: 85. (consideration: CR S3275)
Motion to commit to Senate Committee on Budget with instructions tabled in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 60-35. Record Vote No: 78. (consideration: CR S3021)
Motion to commit to Senate Committee on Budget with instructions tabled in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 60-35. Record Vote No: 77. (consideration: CR S3020)
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Conyers motion to recommit the resolution to the Committee on the Judiciary with instructions that the Committee report the resolution back to the House forthwith with an amendment to exclude all receipts and outlays of the Social Security Fund from the provisions of the balanced budget amendment.
Mr. Conyers moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary.
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.J. Res. 1.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 44, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the Schaefer amendment in the nature of a substitute.
On motion that the Committee rise Failed by recorded vote: 79 - 342, 1 Present (Roll no. 47).
DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the motion to rise and strike the resolving clause.
Mr. Watt (NC) moved to strike the resolving clause.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 44, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the Conyers amendment in the nature of a substitute.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 44, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the Wise amendment in the nature of a substitute.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.R. 44, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 1 hour of debate on the Owens amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 44, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of debate on the Judiciary Committee amendment in the nature of a substitute.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H700-781)
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.J. Res. 1 as unfinished business.
GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole resumed general debate.
The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
Considered as unfinished business.
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.J. Res. 1 as unfinished business.
GENERAL DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 44, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with three hours of general debate.
The Speaker designated the Honorable Robert S. Walker to act as Chairman of the Committee.
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 44 and Rule XXIII.
Rule provides for consideration of H. Con. Res. 17 and H.J. Res. 1 with 4 hours of general debate. The rule provides for 1 hour of general debate in the House on H. Con. Res. 17, and 3 hours of general debate on H.J. Res. 1. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution to final adoption without intervening motion. Specified amendments are in order. It shall be in order to consider H.J. Res. 1 in the Committee of the Whole, with 3 hours of general debate. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Comittee on the Judiciary printed in the joint resolution shall be debatable for one hour. No furter amendment shall be in order except those designated in section 3 of this resolution, if offered in the order and manner specified. If more than one amendment is adopted, the amendment receiving the greatest number of affirmative votes shall be considered as finally adop...
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 44. (consideration: CR H628-657)
Rule H. Res. 44 passed House.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H603, H677-678, H682-686)
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 44 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H. Con. Res. 17 and H.J. Res. 1 with 4 hours of general debate. The rule provides for 1 hour of general debate in the House on H. Con. Res. 17, and 3 hours of general debate on H.J. Res. 1. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution to final adoption without intervening motion. Specified amendments are in order. It shall be in order to consider H.J. Res. 1 in the Committee of the Whole, with 3 hours of general debate. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Comittee on the Judiciary printed in the joint resolution shall be debatable for one hour. No furter amendment shall be in order except those designated in section 3 of this resolution, if offered in the order and manner specified. If more than one amendment is adopted, the amendment receiving the greatest number of affirmative votes shall be considered as finally adop...
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 2.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 104-3.
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 104-3.
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 13.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Bill text & related measures
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.J.Res.1 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.J.Res.1 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.J.Res.1 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.J.Res.1 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.