PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Dec 16, 2011
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make corrections in the enrollment of H.R. 3672 (Disaster Relief Appropriations Act, 2012) to: (1) make an across-the-board 1.83% rescission in discretionary spending for FY2012, with exceptions for the Departments of Defense (DOD) and Veterans Affairs (VA), disaster relief, and Overseas Contingency Operations/the Global War on Terrorism; and (2) require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to report on the account and amount of each rescission.
People & committees
Rep. Rogers, Harold [R-KY-5] · R–KY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Under the order of 12/16/2011, having failed to achieve the required 60 votes in the affirmative, was disagreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 43 - 56. Record Vote Number: 234.
Senate roll call 234 · Individual votesFailed of passage/not agreed to in Senate: Under the order of 12/16/2011, having failed to achieve the required 60 votes in the affirmative, was disagreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 43 - 56. Record Vote Number: 234.
Senate roll call 234 · Individual votesMeasure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S8759)
Received in the Senate.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 255 - 165 (Roll no. 942). (text: CR H9902-9903)
House roll call 942 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 255 - 165 (Roll no. 942).(text: CR H9902-9903)
House roll call 942 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H9906)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause VIII of Rule 20, futher proceedings on H.Con.Res. 94 were postponed.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H9903)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with twenty minutes of debate on H. Con. Res. 94.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 500. (consideration: CR H9902-9903)
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Con.Res.94 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Con.Res.94 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Con.Res.94 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Con.Res.94 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.