Concerning the establishment of a North American Commission on the Environment.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Policy, Trade and Environment.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Mar 11, 1993
Urges the President to reach agreement with Mexico and Canada on the establishment of a North American Commission on the Environment (NACE) to address environmental concerns and promote the protection of the environment and the public health in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) region. Urges NACE to create a Border Environmental Fund to address cleanup of existing environmental problems and construction of facilities to help prevent future environmental and related public health problems in the U.S.-Mexico border region. Urges NACE to participate as an equal partner with the Free Trade Commission established under NAFTA on environmental issues related to NAFTA. Requires NACE to establish and oversee a Secretariat comprising national sections.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 23, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Con.Res.63 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Con.Res.63 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Con.Res.63 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Con.Res.63 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.