Condemning the Democratic People's Republic of Korea for its failure to comply with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and the U.S.-North Korea Agreed Framework of 1994.
Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 13, 2002
Calls on North Korea to: (1) abide by specified articles of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, which it has signed; (2) abide by the U.S.-North Korea Agreed Framework of 1994 by honoring its commitments to freeze its nuclear programs and by allowing the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to carry out inspections; and (3) comply with specified United Nations resolutions.Calls on the IAEA to report to the United Nations on the status of North Korea's compliance with inspections. Calls on members of the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) to suspend construction of the light water reactor in North Korea and shipment of heavy fuel oil to North Korea if the IAEA reports non-compliance by North Korea. Calls on concerned countries to support the suspension of the U.S. commitment under the Framework pending compliance by North Korea with IAEA inspections criteria.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 2, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Con.Res.517 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Con.Res.517 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Con.Res.517 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Con.Res.517 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.