PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Resolution agreed to in Senate Pursuant to the order of the Senate of October 2, 2008, without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 2, 2008
Directs the Secretary of the Senate to correct the enrollment of S. 3001 (Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009) by: (1) changing the amount authorized to be appropriated for the Army from $11,045,052,000 to $10,943,840,000; and (2) changing the amount of authorized funds available for the Defense Science and Technology Program from $11,799,660 to $11,799,660,000.
People & committees
Rep. Skelton, Ike [D-MO-4] · D–MO
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Resolution agreed to in Senate Pursuant to the order of the Senate of October 2, 2008, without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate Pursuant to the order of the Senate of October 2, 2008, without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Received in the Senate, pursuant to the order of October 2, 2008, during the recess of the Senate.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H10673)
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H10673)
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H10673)
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Jul 23, 2020. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Con.Res.442 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Con.Res.442 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Con.Res.442 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Con.Res.442 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.