PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Apr 14, 2011
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 1473 (Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011) to prohibit any funds under such Act or any previous Act from being used to carry out the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act or the health care provisions of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 or any amendments made by those Acts.
People & committees
Rep. Alexander, Rodney [R-LA-5] · R–LA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Disagreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 59. (consideration: CR S2492-2493)
Senate roll call 59 · Individual votesFailed of passage/not agreed to in Senate: Disagreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 59.(consideration: CR S2492-2493)
Senate roll call 59 · Individual votesReceived in the Senate.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 240 - 185 (Roll no. 270). (text: CR H2795)
House roll call 270 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 240 - 185 (Roll no. 270).(text: CR H2795)
House roll call 270 · Individual votesConsidered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2802-2803)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - The Chair put the question on agreeing to H.Con Res. 35 and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Alexander demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on agreeing to H.Con.Res. 35 until later in the legislative day.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H2798)
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 218, the House proceeded with 20 minutes of debate on H. Con. Res. 35.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 218. (consideration: CR H2795-2798)
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Con.Res.35 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Con.Res.35 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Con.Res.35 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Con.Res.35 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.