Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make technical corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1.

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Dec 13, 2001

Directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make specified technical corrections in the enrollment of H.R. 1 (elementary and secondary education).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Boehner, John A. [R-OH-8] · R–OH

Committees

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Dec 19, 2001
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Dec 19, 2001
On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection. (text as House agree to Senate amendment: CR H10430)
Dec 19, 2001
Resolving differences -- House actions: On motion that the House agree to the Senate amendment Agreed to without objection.(text as House agree to Senate amendment: CR H10430)
Dec 19, 2001
Mr. Boehner asked unanimous consent that the House agree to the Senate amendment. (consideration: CR H10430-10431)
Dec 18, 2001
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Dec 18, 2001
Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Dec 18, 2001
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
Dec 18, 2001
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S13422)
Dec 13, 2001
Received in the Senate.
Dec 13, 2001
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Dec 13, 2001
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR H10113-10114)
Dec 13, 2001
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.(text: CR H10113-10114)
Dec 13, 2001
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H10113-10114)
Dec 13, 2001
Introduced in House
Dec 13, 2001
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Enrolled Bill · Not supplied Formatted Text PDF
Engrossed Amendment Senate · Dec 18, 2001 Formatted Text PDF
Engrossed in House · Dec 13, 2001 Formatted Text PDF
Received in Senate · Dec 13, 2001 Formatted Text PDF
Agreed to House · Dec 13, 2001 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

HR 1 · No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

Source last updated: Apr 7, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Con.Res.289 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Con.Res.289, 107th Congress: Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make technical corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/289

Text version to examine: Engrossed Amendment Senate · 2001-12-18.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/hconres289/BILLS-107hconres289eas.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:40:56Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Con.Res.289 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Con.Res.289 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Con.Res.289, 107th Congress: Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make technical corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/289

Text version to examine: Engrossed Amendment Senate · 2001-12-18.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/hconres289/BILLS-107hconres289eas.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:40:56Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Con.Res.289 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Con.Res.289 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Con.Res.289, 107th Congress: Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make technical corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/289

Text version to examine: Engrossed Amendment Senate · 2001-12-18.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/hconres289/BILLS-107hconres289eas.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:40:56Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Con.Res.289 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Con.Res.289 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Con.Res.289, 107th Congress: Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to make technical corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 1.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/289

Text version to examine: Engrossed Amendment Senate · 2001-12-18.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/107/bills/hconres289/BILLS-107hconres289eas.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2025-04-07T13:40:56Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Con.Res.289 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.