PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Foreign Agriculture and Hunger.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jul 25, 1994
Expresses the sense of the Congress that the Secretary of Agriculture should refuse to subsidize the export of durum wheat under the Export Enhancement Program or any other program in any calendar year: (1) succeeding a calendar year in which the domestic harvest of durum wheat is inadequate to meet the needs of U.S. pasta producers; and (2) in which there are trade restrictions in effect on the importation into the United States of such wheat, including quotas, ad valorem tariffs, or tariff rate quotas.
People & committees
Rep. Andrews, Robert E. [D-NJ-1] · D–NJ
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Foreign Agriculture and Hunger.
Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1565-1566)
Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 5, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Con.Res.271 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Con.Res.271 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Con.Res.271 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Con.Res.271 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.