PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.Con.Res.260 / 103rd Congress

Calling for the United States to propose and seek an international conservatorship in Haiti.

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H6158)

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 24, 1994

Provides that: (1) it should be the policy of the United States at international bodies to advocate the creation of an international conservatorship for Haiti; (2) such conservatorship should be responsible for coordinating and administering the delivery of bilateral assistance from international financial institutions, should be of a fixed duration, should seek to rebuild political, economic, and social institutions, and should be established only if the Haitian elected officials and senior military officers voluntarily surrender the responsibility for administering public services (including security and military affairs); (3) the properly elected civilian leadership of Haiti should agree to work closely on domestic policy matters with the conservatorship; and (4) the conservatorship should be created under the authority of the UN Security Council and should operate subject to a resolution adopted by the Security Council and a budget approved by the General Assembly.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Bereuter, Doug [R-NE-1] · R–NE

Committees

  • Foreign Affairs Committee
0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

    Actions

    A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

    1. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H6158)

    2. Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H5470)

    3. Referred to the Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere Affairs.

    4. Referred to the Subcommittee on International Security, International Organizations and Human Rights.

    5. Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

    6. Introduced in House

    7. Introduced in House

    Bill text & related measures

    Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

    Related bills identified by Congress.gov

    No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

    Source last updated: Jan 23, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

    Explore the bill from different angles

    Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

    Neutral evidence review

    Objective

    Analyze H.Con.Res.260 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

    View full prompt & sources
    Fairness and public impact

    Progressive lens

    Examine H.Con.Res.260 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

    View full prompt & sources
    Institutions and government scope

    Conservative lens

    Examine H.Con.Res.260 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

    View full prompt & sources
    Individual rights and government power

    Liberty lens

    Examine H.Con.Res.260 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

    View full prompt & sources