PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.
H.Con.Res.227 / 107th Congress

Condemning bigotry and violence against Arab-Americans, American Muslims, and Americans from South Asia in the wake of terrorist attacks in New York City, New York, and Washington, D.C., on September 11, 2001.

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Sep 14, 2001

Declares that in the quest to identify, bring to justice, and punish the perpetrators and sponsors of the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, the civil rights and civil liberties of all Americans, including Arab-Americans, American Muslims, and Americans from South Asia, should be protected. Condemns any acts of violence or discrimination against any Americans.

Read the summary on Congress.gov
PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

Who introduced it

Rep. Bonior, David E. [D-MI-10] · D–MI

Committees

  • Judiciary Committee
  • Judiciary Committee
116 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

  1. Message on Senate action sent to the House.

  2. Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.

  3. Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.

  4. Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S9859)

  5. Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S9859)

  6. Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

  7. Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

  8. On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection. (text: CR 9/14/2001 CR H5698)

  9. Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to without objection.(text: CR 9/14/2001 CR H5698)

  10. Considered by unanimous consent. (consideration: 9/14/2001 CR H5691-5698)

  11. Mr. Gekas asked unanimous consent to discharge from committee and consider.

  12. Committee on Judiciary discharged.

  13. Committee on Judiciary discharged.

  14. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  15. Introduced in House

  16. Introduced in House

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.

Source last updated: Aug 10, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Con.Res.227 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Con.Res.227 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Con.Res.227 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Con.Res.227 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources