Expressing the sense of Congress that U.S. assistance to Algeria should be terminated unless its military backed government proceeds towards democratization.
Referred to the Subcommittee on International Development, Finance, Trade and Monetary Policy.
Congressional Research Service
Official summary
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 23, 1993
Calls for: (1) the President to actively encourage unconditional negotiations between the Higher State Council of Algeria and all political parties committed to multi-party democracy, including those who won parliamentary seats in the first round elections in December 1991; and (2) suspension of U.S. assistance to the military-backed government of Algeria and U.S. opposition to all loans to Algeria from international lending institutions unless and until the President certifies that the Higher State Council is making significant progress toward the restoration of a democratic process in Algeria.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Explore the bill from different angles
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Neutral evidence review
Objective
Analyze H.Con.Res.196 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
View full prompt & sources
Fairness and public impact
Progressive lens
Examine H.Con.Res.196 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
View full prompt & sources
Institutions and government scope
Conservative lens
Examine H.Con.Res.196 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
View full prompt & sources
Individual rights and government power
Liberty lens
Examine H.Con.Res.196 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.