PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on Europe and the Middle East.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Nov 21, 1993
Expresses continued support for the United Nations Secretary General's current efforts regarding Cyprus. Calls on the Republic of Turkey to support the Secretary General's package of confidence-building measures and to take necessary steps to help resolve the Cyprus problem. Encourages the Turkish Cypriot community to accept the package. Agrees that the Secretary General should invite the Security Council to consider alternative ways to promote the effective implementation of its many resolutions on Cyprus if current efforts do not succeed soon. Declares that the Congress: (1) is aware that the Security Council's adoption of sanctions under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter may be the only alternative available to compel compliance with the dictates of the international community regarding Cyprus; and (2) will encourage the executive branch to support those sanctions if necessary to resolve the conflict.
People & committees
Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [D-NY-14] · D–NY
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Europe and the Middle East.
Referred to the Subcommittee on International Security, International Organizations and Human Rights.
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Con.Res.186 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Con.Res.186 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Con.Res.186 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Con.Res.186 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.