To correct a technical error in the enrollment of H.R. 2160.

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

Congressional Research Service

Official summary

Version 00 · Introduced in House · Oct 6, 1997

Makes a correction in the enrollment of H.R. 2160 (Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies programs appropriations).

Read the summary on Congress.gov

PlainBill analysis is coming later. This page presents official source data. We have not yet published a PlainBill explanation for this bill.

People & committees

Who introduced it

Rep. Skeen, Joe [R-NM-2] · R–NM

Committees

0 cosponsorship records, including any withdrawals

Legislative record

Actions

A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.

Oct 31, 1997
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Oct 29, 1997
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S11335)
Oct 29, 1997
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S11335)
Oct 6, 1997
Received in the Senate.
Oct 6, 1997
Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 232, H. Con. Res. 167 is considered passed House. (consideration: CR H8385)
Oct 6, 1997
Passed/agreed to in House: Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 232, H. Con. Res. 167 is considered passed House.(consideration: CR H8385)
Oct 6, 1997
Introduced in House
Oct 6, 1997
Introduced in House

Primary sources

Bill text & related measures

Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.

Enrolled Bill · Oct 29, 1997 Formatted Text PDF
Received in Senate · Oct 6, 1997 Formatted Text PDF
Engrossed in House · Oct 6, 1997 Formatted Text PDF
Agreed to House · Oct 6, 1997 Formatted Text PDF

Related bills identified by Congress.gov

Source last updated: Oct 26, 2016. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.

AI Conversation Starters

Explore the bill from different angles

Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.

Neutral evidence review

Objective

Analyze H.Con.Res.167 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Con.Res.167, 105th Congress: To correct a technical error in the enrollment of H.R. 2160.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/167

Text version to examine: Enrolled Bill · 1997-10-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hconres167/BILLS-105hconres167enr.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2016-10-26T06:11:46Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Analyze H.Con.Res.167 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.

Fairness and public impact

Progressive lens

Examine H.Con.Res.167 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Con.Res.167, 105th Congress: To correct a technical error in the enrollment of H.R. 2160.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/167

Text version to examine: Enrolled Bill · 1997-10-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hconres167/BILLS-105hconres167enr.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2016-10-26T06:11:46Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Con.Res.167 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.

Institutions and government scope

Conservative lens

Examine H.Con.Res.167 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Con.Res.167, 105th Congress: To correct a technical error in the enrollment of H.R. 2160.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/167

Text version to examine: Enrolled Bill · 1997-10-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hconres167/BILLS-105hconres167enr.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2016-10-26T06:11:46Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Con.Res.167 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.

Individual rights and government power

Liberty lens

Examine H.Con.Res.167 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.

View full prompt & sources

Discuss H.Con.Res.167, 105th Congress: To correct a technical error in the enrollment of H.R. 2160.

Official record: https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/167

Text version to examine: Enrolled Bill · 1997-10-29.

Official full text: https://www.congress.gov/105/bills/hconres167/BILLS-105hconres167enr.htm

Imported record last updated by the source: 2016-10-26T06:11:46Z. Verify current status and distinguish any later version from the version above.

Read the official text before answering. If you cannot access it, say so and ask me to provide it; do not assume a link means you have read the document. Distinguish proposals from enacted law, cite sources, and separate facts, interpretation, and uncertain predictions. Include counterarguments even when using a particular perspective.

Examine H.Con.Res.167 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.