PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Subcommittee on International Security, International Organizations and Human Rights.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Aug 6, 1993
Commends the President for his decision to continue the moratorium on nuclear testing. Encourages the President to begin preparations expeditiously for multilateral negotiations on a comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty. Expresses the sense of the Congress that: (1) the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons is an essential component of international security and should be extended indefinitely in 1995; and (2) amounts that would have been made available to conduct nuclear tests during FY 1994 should be reallocated as specified, to pay the U.S. assessed contributions to the International Atomic Energy Agency and for the preparatory commission of the Chemical Weapons Convention, to assist emerging democracies in Eastern Europe and the independent states of the former Soviet Union in developing an adequate system of export controls, and for the Reduced Enrichment in Research and Test Reactors Program.
People & committees
Rep. Berman, Howard L. [D-CA-26] · D–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on International Security, International Organizations and Human Rights.
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Feb 7, 2024. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Con.Res.137 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Con.Res.137 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Con.Res.137 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Con.Res.137 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.