PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Ordered to be Reported.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · Jun 10, 1993
Expresses the sense of the Congress that: (1) the Treaty of Rarotonga (which prohibits the testing, manufacture, acquisition, and stationing of nuclear weapons in the territory of parties to the Treaty and the dumping of radioactive wastes at sea) is consistent with U.S. security commitments in the South Pacific and satisfies the seven criteria established by the U.S. Government for judging the effectiveness of proposed nuclear weapon-free zones; (2) signature and ratification of the protocols to that Treaty would be in the U.S. national interest and would not prejudge U.S. policy with respect to proposals for such zones in other regions; and (3) the United States should sign and ratify the protocols to that Treaty.
People & committees
Del. Faleomavaega, Eni F. H. [D-AS-At Large] · D–AS
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Ordered to be Reported.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Executive Comment Received from State.
Executive Comment Requested from State.
Referred to the Subcommittee on International Security, International Organizations and Human Rights.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific.
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3777-3780)
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 23, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Con.Res.111 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Con.Res.111 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Con.Res.111 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Con.Res.111 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.