PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Congressional Research Service
Version 81 · Passed House without amendment · Mar 21, 2003
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced in the House on March 20, 2003. The summary of that version is repeated here.)Expresses the unequivocal support and appreciation of the Nation: (1) to the President as Commander-in-Chief for his firm leadership and decisive action in the conduct of military operations in Iraq as part of the on-going Global War on Terrorism; (2) to the members of the U.S. armed forces serving in Operation Iraqi Freedom, who are carrying out their missions with excellence, patriotism, and bravery; and (3) to the families of the U.S. military personnel serving in Operation Iraqi Freedom, who are providing support and prayers for their loved ones currently engaged in military operations in Iraq.
People & committees
Rep. Hunter, Duncan [R-CA-52] · R–CA
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Received in the Senate.
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 392 - 11, 22 Present (Roll no. 83). (text: CR 3/20/2003 H2229)
House roll call 83 · Individual votesPassed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 392 - 11, 22 Present (Roll no. 83).(text: CR 3/20/2003 H2229)
House roll call 83 · Individual votesPOSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate the yeas and nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, further proceedings were postponed.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to a previous order of the House.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with two hours of debate on H. Con. Res. 104.
Mr. Hunter asked unanimous consent for the immediate consideration of the concurrent resolution pursuant to the earlier order of the House. (consideration: CR H2227-2251, H2262-2263)
ORDER OF BUSINESS - Mr. Hunter sent to the desk a concurrent resolution and asked unanimous consent for its immediate consideration pursuant to the following order: Debate on the concurrent resolution shall be limited to two hours equally divided and controlled by Mr. Hunter and Mr. Skelton; and that the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for a division of the question. Agreed to without objection.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We currently store references to these documents.
No related bills are listed in this snapshot. This does not establish whether the proposal has appeared in earlier Congresses.
Source last updated: Jan 14, 2025. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Con.Res.104 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Con.Res.104 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Con.Res.104 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Con.Res.104 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.