PlainBillCongress, translated.Legislation. Context. Public interest.Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Congressional Research Service
Version 00 · Introduced in House · May 13, 2026
This concurrent resolution directs the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities against Iran or any part of its government or military unless a declaration of war or authorization to use military force for such purpose has been enacted.
The resolution specifies that it shall not be construed to prevent the United States from defending itself, its Armed Forces, its diplomatic facilities, or allied states from imminent attack.
People & committees
Rep. Foushee, Valerie P. [D-NC-4] · D–NC
Legislative record
A procedural vote is different from passage. Passage in one chamber does not establish enactment. Explore the glossary.
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Submitted in House
Submitted in House
Primary sources
Text links open the official source. We also preserved the text version used in the PlainBill explanation below.
Source last updated: Sep 19, 2026. Consult Congress.gov for the current record.
AI Conversation Starters
Choose a perspective, copy a prompt, and paste it into your preferred AI. Each prompt includes the bill version and available official source links, and asks for counterarguments as well as supporting evidence.
Analyze H.Con.Res.100 as objectively as possible. Explain its main provisions, who would be affected, possible benefits and harms, implementation, exceptions, and uncertainties. Present the strongest arguments for and against it, and identify evidence needed to assess its public impact.
Examine H.Con.Res.100 through a progressive lens, focusing on fairness, access, economic inequality, and effects on vulnerable communities. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and distinguish stated goals from demonstrated outcomes.
Examine H.Con.Res.100 through a conservative lens, focusing on fiscal responsibility, institutional stability, federalism, and the scope of government. Explain potential benefits, costs, and unintended consequences. Consider the strongest counterarguments and any provisions that challenge this perspective.
Examine H.Con.Res.100 through a civil-liberties and limited-government lens. Consider individual rights, privacy, voluntary choice, accountability, and government power. Explain tradeoffs, possible safeguards, and the strongest counterarguments without assuming the proposal is beneficial or harmful.
PlainBill explanation
Based on the full Introduced in House · 2026-05-13 text. This explanation has not received human editorial review. This overview describes the proposal’s major provisions; it does not establish what its real-world effects would be.
This proposed resolution would direct the President to end U.S. military involvement in hostilities against Iran unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or a specific authorization to use military force against Iran. It preserves defense against imminent attacks, defensive troop deployments, and intelligence activities covered by the text. The resolution itself would not authorize military force.
Congress hereby directs the President to remove the use of the United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran or any part of its government or military, including potential ground forces in a combat role or used for occupation, unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran.
Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) prevent the United States from defending itself, its Armed Forces, its diplomatic facilities, or allied states from imminent attack; (2) prevent the United States Armed Forces from maintaining a troop presence in the region for defensive purposes
Nothing in this resolution may be construed to influence or disrupt any intelligence, counterintelligence, or investigative activities relating to threats in or emanating from Iran or surrounding countries
nothing in this concurrent resolution may be construed as authorizing the use of military force.
Section 1 would direct the President, under section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to end the use of U.S. armed forces in hostilities against Iran's government or military. This includes potential ground forces used in combat or occupation. The direction has an exception for explicit authorization through a declaration of war or a specific authorization to use military force against Iran.
Pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(c)), Congress hereby directs the President to remove the use of the United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran or any part of its government or military, including potential ground forces in a combat role or used for occupation, unless explicitly authorized by a declaration of war or specific authorization for use of military force against Iran.
The termination provision would not prevent the United States from defending itself, its armed forces, diplomatic facilities, or allied states against imminent attack.
Nothing in this section may be construed to— (1) prevent the United States from defending itself, its Armed Forces, its diplomatic facilities, or allied states from imminent attack
The termination provision would allow a defensive U.S. troop presence in the region and would not require the removal of forces there that are not engaged in hostilities against Iran.
(2) prevent the United States Armed Forces from maintaining a troop presence in the region for defensive purposes; or (3) force the removal of the United States Armed Forces in the region who are not engaged in hostilities against Iran.
Section 2 would protect intelligence collection and analysis, counterintelligence, and investigative activities concerning threats in or coming from Iran or surrounding countries, when conducted by or with the U.S. government. It also protects intelligence sharing with coalition partners if the President determines that sharing is appropriate and serves U.S. national security interests.
Nothing in this resolution may be construed to influence or disrupt any intelligence, counterintelligence, or investigative activities relating to threats in or emanating from Iran or surrounding countries conducted by, or in conjunction with, the United States Government involving— (1) the collection of intelligence; (2) the analysis of intelligence; or (3) the sharing of intelligence between the United States and any coalition partner, if the President determines such sharing is appropriate and in the national security interests of the United States.
Section 3 states that the concurrent resolution itself would provide no authorization to use military force, citing section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution.
Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1547(a)(1)), nothing in this concurrent resolution may be construed as authorizing the use of military force.
The official-actions snapshot updated September 19, 2026, records submission in the House and referral to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on May 13, 2026.
Source snapshot updated 2026-09-19T23:35:29Z. 2026-05-13: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. 2026-05-13: Submitted in House
A closer look
Reviewed version: Introduced in House · 2026-05-13. These findings describe provisions and who may benefit; they are not judgments of waste, corruption, or motive.
This review covers the supplied bill text. “None identified” does not rule out provisions in later versions or accompanying reports and disclosures.
Provisions outside the bill’s main subject, or policy changes attached to appropriations.
None identified in the reviewed text
No unrelated provision was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion applies only to that version, not other versions or accompanying materials.
Spending directed to particular recipients or places outside ordinary competitive or formula-based allocation.
None identified in the reviewed text
No congressionally directed spending for particular recipients or places was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. This conclusion does not establish the absence of earmarks in other versions or accompanying materials.
Narrow exceptions, exemptions, or preferential treatment that warrant a closer look.
None identified in the reviewed text
No materially narrow preferential benefit was identified in the complete supplied introduced text. The exceptions define the scope of the main military and intelligence policy. This conclusion is limited to the supplied version.
Full text preserved for this analysis. Legislative record snapshot: Sep 19, 2026. How PlainBill uses AI